America’s economic playbook is changing—and blockchain may be the next frontier.
In a headline-grabbing move, the U.S. federal government acquired a 10% stake in Intel, the nation’s flagship semiconductor giant. For some, this marks a dangerous shift away from America’s long-cherished free-market capitalism. For others, it’s a bold act of economic nationalism designed to secure vital industries.
But here’s the bigger question few are asking:
👉 If Washington can own part of Intel, what’s stopping it from owning crypto infrastructure too?
Trump’s New Playbook: From Regulator to Market Player
This isn’t Trump’s first clash with free-market conservatives. Earlier in June, his administration only approved Nippon Steel’s acquisition of U.S. Steel if Washington secured a “golden share” with governance authority.
Criticism poured in, but Trump didn’t flinch. On Truth Social, he declared he’d make such deals “all day long.”
Why? Because to Team Trump, strategic industries are no longer safe in the hands of private markets alone. They’re national security assets.
And that’s exactly how crypto could be framed next.
The Crypto Connection
Trump has been laying the groundwork for years:
- GENIUS Act → clearing a path for mainstream stablecoin adoption.
- U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve → locking seized BTC into a government-backed vault.
- SEC Crypto Task Force (“Project Crypto”) → realigning regulators for digital assets.
- Regulatory Dismissals → halting major cases against crypto firms.
Now, insiders hint that Washington prefers “budget neutral” strategies to expand crypto reserves—meaning no new taxes, just creative swaps.
That’s exactly what happened with Intel: the equity stake was funded by CHIPS Act grants, already budgeted for R&D. No extra taxpayer burden. In theory, similar federal blockchain grant programs could be exchanged for token stakes in a domestic payments network.
Why It Matters
Like chips, crypto is infrastructure.
- Semiconductors = backbone of digital technology.
- Blockchains = backbone of digital money.
If Intel is precedent, the U.S. could easily justify owning pieces of blockchain protocols as a matter of national security.
The only question is which assets they choose to back:
- Will Washington double down on Bitcoin, cementing its role as a nation-state hodler?
- Or will it bet on stablecoins or alternative networks as the rails of tomorrow’s digital economy?
TechAtLast Insight: A Future of State-Owned Crypto
The U.S. is no longer just a referee in high-tech markets. It’s becoming a player. From Intel to Bitcoin, Washington is showing it wants skin in the game.
For blockchain entrepreneurs and investors, this is a paradigm shift. The federal government may soon sit across from you—not just as a regulator, but as a shareholder, validator, or even a whale.
This “Trump Doctrine of Digital Capitalism” could usher in:
- Greater legitimacy for blockchain networks the U.S. backs.
- Market distortions if Washington favors one chain over another.
- A global race where other governments start hoarding or funding their own crypto networks.
The stakes are enormous. The precedent is clear. And the future? It might just be written block by block, coin by coin.
🚀 Final Takeaway:
If Intel is the test run, blockchain is the endgame. The U.S. government may soon own a piece of the crypto rails you’re building. The question isn’t if—it’s which chain they choose.
More About Me
